Paul's Guerilla Grassroots Could Win Nevada & Latinos

You can buy this shirt at Atomic Flip for $29

The Guerilla Grassroots

It is no doubt to anyone that Ron Paul is running an unconventional campaign and it isn’t just his patented guerilla grassroots replete with money bombs and a legion of fervent Paulistas that raises eyebrows.  Paul has a unique and long-term caucus strategy focusing on proportional delegates, picking his fights carefully. 

His campaign is famous for relying on relatively decentralized even “rouge” and local efforts who distance themselves from even official Ron Paul campaign organs, as evidenced in South Carolina.  The Washington Examiner reported: “Charleston for Ron Paul prefers the official Paul campaign to stay unaffiliated.”

Many lauded the technical acumen of the Obama campaign for its utilization of social media and get out the vote efforts, but it pales in comparison to the self-starting nature of Ron Paul’s campaign.  For example, RonPaulCountry.com has a “Grassroots War Room” founded by volunteers out of New Jersey and it literally makes you feel as if you’re in a real time political bunker. 

Inundated with timetables for the next primary and information directing potential Paulites to where they are needed most.  It offers an impressive platform all the while reminding its members: “…Because saving the country should be fun”, yet another example of the privatization, technical prowess and devolution inherent to Paul’s unique brand of electoral politics.

While some in the mainstream media saw the Paul campaign backing off in South Carolina it could have also been as easily characterized as de facto delegation of campaign responsibility.  If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.  In the end Charleston for Ron Paul efforts were entirely volunteer, self-funded and self-directed – frugal. 

These examples of spontaneous organization couldn’t be more fitting for a man who has spent over 30 years educating the American public on the benefits of the invisible hand in the free market, a hand which evidently has its fingers all over Ron Paul’s campaign.

Looking Past South Carolina

            While South Carolina wasn’t a win for Ron Paul, the Gingrich win will sap strength from Romney and guarantee a longer primary season, moreover it will reduce the prospects of Rick Santorum climbing any higher than his Iowa zenith.  While Paul has sustained a significant blow in South Carolina, his campaign will undoubtedly continue to slog through this back loaded GOP marathon. 

As I have argued before Ron Paul’s plans to Win the West, a region more in line with his libertarian social platform is key to his success at forcing the GOP to assimilate much of his platform.  Even if Paul doesn’t win the nomination if he can accumulate enough delegates he might be able to impose a libertarian platform upon the eventual nominee.

            After South Carolina, while the nation has already started to become distracted by the Florida throw down and its boatload (no pun intended) of delegates, Ron Paul was the first to buy ad time in Nevada and Minnesota (site for his 2008 shadow convention).  Nevada political guru Jon Ralston confirmed my sentiments about the libertarian leaning Silver State, which may deliver Ron Paul a needed victory.  According to Ralston: “Nevada is to some extent still a very libertarian state…That goes across party lines and Paul is officially a libertarian running in the Republican party.  There’s a lot of resonance there.”

The Hispanic Vote

            Time’s blog Swampland mentioned that much of Ron Paul’s appeal to Hispanics which makes up 26% of Nevada’s population, nearly 34% in California, 27% in Arizona will theoretically play into Paul’s favor.  While Ron Paul supports English as the official language of the Federal Government, building a boarder fence, minutemen volunteerism, ending or better put clarifying the 14^th Amendment’s controversial birthright citizenship provision, and rejecting amnesty he is overall pro immigration free from federal subsidy through food stamps, social security, hospital mandates and free education.

            The disparate affects on Latinos on both sides of the borders who are caught in the middle of the War on Drugs should prove to play in the West as well.  Recently, it was found the US-Mexico border region was deadlier than war torn Afghanistan, the vast majority were cartel-sponsored murders.  There were even bizarre stories of gladiator games, which would select the strongest captor for suicide bombings in towns controlled by rival cartels. 

Stateside, Latinos are four times likely to be incarcerated than whites according to the Department of Justice, talk about "resonance".  Both Romney and Gingrich scoff at the prospect of reevaluating drug laws, they would rather demagogue the issue than solve it.  Hispanics evidently agree with some of this as 51% view Paul in a favorable light compared to 25% for Romney.

The fact the West Coast as well as upcoming Minnesota leans left bodes well for Dr. Paul as he is often credited for pulling left of center issue voters into his coalition of civil libertarians.  West Coast independents whom gravitate toward these same social values will find Paul’s brand much more appealing than those of Gingrich and Romney whom are attempting to desperately evince social conservative metal.

Not Libertarian? You're Probably a Socialist

Topher Morrison

PurpleSerf.com

PART I

pics on Sodahead 

We Are The Planners, not you.

          In March of 1944, amidst the crescendo of World WarII, F.A. Hayek dedicated his seminal work The Road to Serfdom to “The Socialists of All Parties.”  He recognized the carnal desire that spanned the entire political spectrum, which ultimately lead to so much bloodshed – the desire to plan for others.

          All political persuasions will agree government is really good at accomplishing one thing, monopolizing violence, in other words, coercion.  It follows therefore that the largerthe government, the larger its ability to coerce.  We have all leant tothe state this legitimate force except in matters of our own immediate self-defense and while we may have a gun for that purpose the government is designed to always have a bigger one. 

          We lend this power because government’s central role, first and foremost, is protection of life. Liberty thereafter is what our conscience demands and what our hearts desire.  Through liberty we mix our labor with property and create the world in which we live and hopefully thrive.  When government fails at anyone of these junctures tyrannies are invited and are allowed to grow.

          Our representatives, whom were honestly and appropriately called "public servants", are now unfortunately referred to as "officials", "leaders", etc.  They originally had few duties, all mutually boring and tedious, but nonetheless essential to our well being hence, they were in the public'sservice.  

          Life wasn't meant to be sexy as most of their time was to be spent establishing "weights andmeasures", deliberating monetary policy, growing the judiciaries, maintaining diplomacy, and providing for the common defense, in other words, to engage in the eye watering monotony that was public life.  

          It was nevermeant to be a career, but a way of giving back to a nation that afforded the liberty to establish themselves.  It was viewed as a truly philanthropic endeavor of the highest order.  Could anyone today, with little exception, claim that of their representative and do it with a straight face?

          Our servants were to simply guard the institutions charged with executing these fundamental duties from both ineptitude and undue growth.  God willing after a few terms they were then to return from whence they came hence, the citizen statesmen.  When they ceased to function as humble sentinels and begin to act as permanent managers was in our interest and our duty to remove them from office.  At least that was the plan.  Permanent managers is lamentably what they have now become, what we refer to as the "leadership class" or more appropriately the "establishment."

Government isn't a business either.

            You often hear, especially from the right, that government should be run like a business.  Republican candidates Mitt Romney and HermanCain have touted their private sector resume, but why?  Granted, achievements are necessary in defining leadership acumen, however, there is little to justify running government like a business.

          Businesses are meant to grow, set prices, innovate, hire, sell products and services - to compete.  Not many Americans want their government competing with them.  We already have enough of this already we need more of it on Main St. not on Capitol Hill.  This isn't confined to only the right, however.  

          How often does the left laud plans to increase "revenue?"  It is obvious both the left and right see government as some kind of legitimate business, I stress to you it is not.  One cannot simply purchase protective services for rights and liberties from another government.  There are roughly 190 governments throughout the world, and compared with the seemingly infinite number of businesses most of us are pretty much stuck with the government we've got.

          You might argue, however,that beyond the simple and achievable trio of mandates mentioned earlier it is also the role or duty of our leaders to plan for us so we may all enjoy the full expression of life, liberty and property equally.  Sounds reasonable, but there is a clear distinction between planning through coercion and planning to compel others, including government organs, to respect our rights and liberties.  

          It is only by accomplishing the latter do we enable each other to plan for ourselves and therefore enable everyone to enjoy freedom as such, equally.  We are theplanners.  When that role is usurped whether by dictators, our favorite actor, monarchies, technocrats or democracies - we become serfs.

NEXT: The Left & The Right as Socialists