Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts

Sunday, July 8, 2012

DARPA's New Mind Control Tech a “Taste of Armageddon?”

Topher Morrison

From the BBC
On Friday we briefly covered at AMTV News an intriguing new development in the realm of neuroscience and its potential commercial and most likely military applications.  According to the BBC, the new project “Sentinel (SystEm for Notification of Threats Inspired by Neurally Enabled Learning)…is being touted as the world’s first ‘cognitive-neural’ binocular-threat warning system.

Sharon Weinberger explains how it works in practice:
A high-tech camera scans a wide field of view, and then picks out potential threats based on sophisticated algorithms that mimic the human vision system. Then images of those threats are flashed in rapid succession through a viewer to the user, whose brain signals are being monitored. When the brain spots a potential threat and gives off the P300, the signal is detected and the user is visually alerted to focus on that specific image.
The goggles were developed under a research project funded by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).  It is an initial foray into “military neuro-enhancement using what is called a brain-machine interface.”  DARPA is preparing to embark on a veritable “brain race” funding similar brain-computer interface projects to help “intelligence analysts sort through satellite imagery.”

Commercial and medical applications are foreseeable including “controlling prosthetics” and for the “automotive industry” to help design safer cars.  According to the chief scientist Dr. Deepak Khosla of HRL Laboratories, however, the “holy grail of course” is whether or not these technologies can be designed to “decode higher level information” – to read minds.

Beyond mind reading the military applications proffer “more novel use of armed drones” ultimately allowing soldiers to fight remotely and brining up a host of ethical issues over “projecting human intelligence into a device” according to Jonathan Moreno, a professor of bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. 

Should an adversary use similar technologies the dynamics of future wars, where mass armies of drones fight each other under control of distant humans, would be wildly dissimilar to today’s.

Star Trek Episode: “A Taste of Armageddon”

In Gene Roddenberry’s first Star Trek series in 1967 the original crew of the USS Enterprise visit the planet Eminiar VII whose people fight a war with a neighboring planet.  However, once visiting the planet Captain James T. Kirk is warned by Eminiar leaders he should not have come because a Vendikar fusion bomb had just hit and killed a half million people.  The only problem is the capitol city is in pristine order, there are no signs of war and no destruction to speak of. 

The crew of the Enterprise soon finds out that the people of Eminiar VII fight a totally simulated war, but it turns out to be no mere game of intergalactic Risk.  It is completely controlled by computer algorithms, which launch wargame attacks and counterattacks, then calculate the damage and select the dead.  Citizens deemed as “killed” must submit themselves to real executions inside “disintegration booths” based on the results.

While our current small wars have little resemblance to the World Wars of the last century and future wars waged against emergent nations of China and Russia may resemble the Cold War – proxy war – may take on a whole new meaning as both sides employ newer and newer technologies.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

MEDIA MYOPIA: Oslo Massacres' Reports and un-Reported

Topher Morrison
PurpleSerf.com

Immediately the pictures of the Oslo, Norway bombing bring
back memories of the Oklahoma City bombing.
Image Source: Mirror.co.uk

It is important in any investigation to ascertain the facts before a narrative is woven.  This is a taste of what is being reported in the mainstream media:


New York Times


"Norwegian police on Saturday charged a man they identify as a right-wing fundamentalist Christian.


"...a gun loving Norwegian obsessed with what he saw as the threat of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration."


"Facebook page and Twitter account set up under that name [Anders Behring Breivik] days before the rampage, suggesting a conscious effort to create a public persona."


"...a remarkably meticulous attack on Norway's current and future political elite."


"...at least 85 people, some as young as 16, were killed in an attack on a summer camp..."


"...'slaughter of young children.'"


"...many from political families..."


"...the gunman calmly and methodically shot..."


"...attacker wore a police uniform..."


"...camp has been an important rite of passage for the country's budding young liberals."


"...saw a second man, about 5-foot-11, with dark hair, holding a pistol and carrying a rifle..."


"police official, Roger Andresen..."he is right-wing and a Christian fundamentalist."


"...soldiers cordoned off the square where the bombing occcured...armed soldiers in camoflauge gear was a jarring sight."



“…questions about whether the Norwegian security services and police, which had been concentrating on threats of Islamic terrorism, missed the threat from the anti-Islamic right.

"This is the Norwegian equivalent to Timothy McVeigh."

“’This is right-wing domestic terrorism, and the big question is to what extent Norwegian agencies have diverted their attention from what they knew decades ago was the biggest threat’ and instead focused on threats from militant Islamist groups.”



"...writings on a right-wing site, Document.no, revealed...an abiding obsesion with Marxists, Mulsims, and Norway's multicultural ideals."


“'It may make a lot of people reflect on the challenges of integration and ensuring tolerance and antiracism, so that these views can be openly rejected by everyone in Norway,' Mr. Ulrichsen [reasercher at London School of Economics] said."


BBC


"...possible another person was involved."


"suspect reported by local media to have had links to right wing extremists"


"...Norway has had problems with neo-Nazi groups in the past..."


"farm supply firm has confirmed selling six tonnes of fertilizer to Breivik."


"...tall blonde man dressed as a policeman opened fire indiscriminately..."


"...two weapons, one of them an automatic rifle."


This is what has not been reported (at least when it comes to mainstream media):


"Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terror Blast"


DHS video framing white right-wing extremists ranked 6th biggest story in the world according to Alexa.com day before Oslo attacks.


Mr. Brievik may have been a practicing Free Mason?  At least according to his days old Facebook page he was.  


There is a massive body of evidence that government, through covert intelligence agencies, quasi-government bodies, and interested societies, have attempted to manipulate public opinion through terrorist attacks.  This has been well documented for decades.  The fact that mainstream media won't add this into their coverage should concern all of us.  


I'm sure those of you who are unaware or outright disagree with me on these facts are thinking "conspiracy theorist", but the "lone gunman" scenario currently being proffered is not copacetic with the last 50 years of geopolitical history.  Moreover, the temporal and physical proximity of this event to the current tumult being felt in Europe and throughout the world should invoke high suspicion from the fourth estate yet it has received little if no attention.  Europe and the United States are being turned upside down economically and this event is being treated as if it occurred in a vacuum.  


I am not submitting this event is an example of a false-flag, however, to immediately treat it prima facie as what it seems without allowing historical precedents to supply us with prudent questions and alternative scenarios is negligent.  Evidence is scant so far to support anything, however, there is a glaring dearth of focus on the political ramifications of this attack.  This is my point.  We live in an age of hyper-politics where one act changes everything, we have a right to be suspicious.


A great book on the history of false-flag and state-sponsored terror (and their drug connections) plus a whole lot of blowback:


Peter Dale Scott outlines a fascinating history
of covert operations and exposes the deep powers
and financial interests involved.
There are two states in this world, the one we know about
and learn in civics class and the deep state few of
us care to admit is there.