AMTV News: Russia Deploys Warships to Syria

Topher Morrison

PurpleSerf.com

This is AMTV News, I’m your host Topher Morrison.  Today is Wednesday July 11^th 2012.

If it bleeds it leads…

Russian Warships to Maneuver Near Syria

New York Times

Bashar al-Assad looks like he has a new pitbull.  Protecting its last ally in the Middle East, but most importantly its access to the Mediterranean Russia is sending a flotilla of 11 Russian warships, capable of c arrying hundreds of marines to dock in the ancient port of Tartus.  It is a clear message to the region and the US backing rebel forces in Syria.  Washington is predictably mum, but with poker faces aplenty is it call or check?

Next…

Obama EO Grants Authority to Seize Private Communication Facilities

Electronic Privacy Information Center

Obama has done what the people’s congress could not last year because of public protest.  His order grants new powers to the Department of Homeland Security, most importantly, the power to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications.  Reasoning Washington needs “at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions.” Seems like a one-way street.

Here’s something interesting…

Like 3D?  Imagine 6!

Before It’s News

In the latest from the people who found God in a subatomic particle, the Higgs Boson, comes a new experiment called ATLAS.  The megaminds at CERN using their Large Hydron Collider believe they can view three more dimensions beyond what humans can perceive.  Major surpises are yet on the horizon and possibly even more questions.

Next…

Lone Star State Top Pick for Business

CNBC

On the heels of news that every state with a Republican governor saw reductions in unemployment, Texas is lauded as the best state in America to do business in.  Receiving high marks in CNBC’s grading rubric for infrastructure, tech and innovation, the third lowest cost of living, access to capital all while recovering from a severe economic slump last year.  Get er done!

This is getting ridiculous…

Pentagon Considers Awarding Medals to Drone Pilots

Glenn Greenwald

The military’s gamers, sorry… drone pilots might wear flight suits to work, but they don’t need them.  Spying on weddings, sorry… children…err enemy combatants thousands of miles away from harm sipping on Monster is hardly valorous so why is the Pentagon glorifying ridding a joystick?  Want to award our fearless flyers?  How about a new Nintendo Wii and call it a day?

This is going to get weird…

The Islamist Pyramid Scheme

Washington Times

That’s right the Arab Spring may have just been a plan to install a pyramid scheme that is to say – destroy the Great Pyramids of Giza.  Recent islamist electoral victories throughout the region have spurred the less than reasonable to accomplish what Amr bin al-As, Egypt’s Muslim conqueror, could not in 640 AD.  This week alone 16 ancient mausoleums were ransacked in Mali, viral video showed the Taliban stoning women again and who doesn’t remember the 1,500-year-old Buddah they razed in 2001?  Time to guard the wonders of the world.

Catch my latest choice headlines on AMTV News Monday – Friday at AMTV Media and catch our in depth commentary and analysis of stories like these at GreeneWave.com part of the AMTV network.

Not Libertarian? You're Probably a Socialist

EDITOR'S NOTE:  If you haven’t read the first part of this series, please do: We are The Planners, Not You.  Government isn’t a Business Either.

Part II

Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC hits the nail on the head.

The Left & The Right As Socialists

Both Republicans and Democrats plan.  Off the bat it doesn't sound like a bad thing, think “social safety net”.  But the notion of planning is predicated on the idea that someone else has information you don't, moreover that they have the right to plan for you.  While the former may of course be true, the information age has diluted the strength of this argument significantly.  This brings us to the right to plan.

To “plan” by public sanction is to evince a value desiring the wide recognition of a social goal, think universal health care, a drug free America, a living wage, a stable and friendly Iraq, the War on Poverty, the list is endless because our potential values are endless.  Hence, to enact said “plan”, through whatever political mechanism available is appropriately called - socialism. 

While use of the word socialism might not be politically correct as Lawrence O’Donnell admits, its use per the definition is very much still en vogue.  Considering everything is in some measure societal in nature and therefore social then anything positively enacted which diminishes someone's life, liberty or property rather than precluding encroachment upon these rights is socialism. This is how F.A. Hayek put it in The Road to Serfdom in 1944:

“…Some groups may want less socialism than others…some want socialism mainly in the interest of one group and others in that of another.  The important point is that if we take the people whose views influence developments they are now in the democracies in some measure all socialists.”

F.A. Hayek was echoing a fundamental truth which gripped European politics as far back as 1888 when Sir William Harcourt announced to Britain’s House of Commons: “We are all socialists now.”  Sir William found his modern voice in Republican President Richard Nixon when he proclaimed the same “We are all Keynesians now” referring to F.A. Hayek’s socialist contemporary.

            The fact of the matter is every American ideological movement save one, Libertarianism, is socialist from one degree to another.  In other words, while each party may espouse individual freedom in one arena or another they all require government to do their bidding regarding a small number of particular values and always at our expense.  Often times we call these “special interests.”  This line of reasoning may seem austere, but this merely validates my point.

The New American Century’s Enemy: Gullibility  

            After the fall of the Soviet Union and with it the easy to hate goose-stepping armies and the ubiquitous red flags it was hard for many of us to anticipate how our next enemy might be one of our own creation.  This is not new and was not unanticipated.  F.A. Hayek alluded to how Americans might succumb to similar seductions:

“It seems almost as if we did not want to understand the development which has produced totalitarianism because such an understanding might destroy some of the dearest illusions to which we are determined to cling.” 

            While there has been robust argument over what is more important than another thing, as O’Donnell puts it between good or bad socialism, there has been little progress in restricting the scope of government, regardless of the mountain of rhetoric piled on since the Reagan Revolution.  The beast was never starved, the Keynesians and our Central Bank saw to that.  If you’ve noticed our debt is higher than ever, we owe more than we’re worth.

            The question then is, to what "dearest illusions" are we still holding onto?  Well think of all the social ends I mentioned at the beginning of this article.  All are demonstrable failures, ephemeral taglines tossed aside as easily as they are conjured in favor of more sensational and politically expedient slogans.  It is all mere marketing.

          It's the difference between an arrogant vanguard seeking ever-newer demons to vanquish and the chastened but vigilant guardian seeking to protect the individual so he himself may conquer, create, aid and love.  As O’Donnell astutely points out, Glen Greenwald is timid to show his stripes.  Like the slogans they extol the word socialist has undergone similar metamorphoses: "liberal", "progressive", "neoliberal", "labour", "neoconservative", "progressive-Republican", no doubt reaching into perpetuity awaiting a new banner to raise.

          Uncomfortable in their own skin these political chameleons demagogue our fears and passions in one realm or another and they use our wealth and technology to achieve their current social goal.  More often than not as it goes because it can be done means it should be done!  But this is the "dearest illusion, which we are determined to cling."  Again, think of the social goals I mentioned earlier as you read how F.A. Hayek felt about allowing politicians and bureaucrats to plan for us:

“They would merely make it necessary to choose between gaining a particular advantage by compulsion and not obtaining it – or, in most instances, obtaining it a little later, when further technical advance has overcome the particular difficulties.  It is true that in such situations we may have to sacrifice a possible immediate gain as the price of our freedom – but we avoid, on the other hand, the necessity of making future developments dependent upon the knowledge, which particular people now possess. 

By sacrificing such possible present advantages we preserve an important stimulus to further progress.  Though in the short run the price we have to pay for variety and freedom of choice may sometimes be high in the long run even material progress will depend on this very variety, because we can never predict from which of the many forms in which a good or service can be provided something better may develop.”

In other words our political leaders are not seers.

NEXT: How the governments of the left and right distort reality.

Go Away Dick

Topher Morrison
PurpleSerf.com


The Obama and Bush administrations aren't so different when it comes to growing government and refusing to acknowledge, in the words of the late Chalmers Johnson, "the sorrows of empire."


          Columnist Glenn Greenwald Salon.com and MSNBC's The Last Word with Chris Hayes on Thursday admonished the American public for welcoming back Dick Cheney, vice-president to George W. Bush, into "polite society."  Like President Bush months ago, Dick Cheney had no qualms with utilizing the enhanced interrogation method of waterboarding, considered torture by many, to extract information from high value detainees.  


          The current administration isn't blameless here either.  The reason why Barack Obama would rather "look forward, not backward" when it comes to allegations of war crimes and torture is because with two examples of comparable characteristics analogies are easy to draw.  Although Obama claimed to have rescinded Bush era interrogation policies, significant loopholes still exist.  

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy