Topher Morrison
PurpleSerf.com
It is important in any investigation to ascertain the facts before a narrative is woven. This is a taste of what is being reported in the mainstream media:
New York Times
"Norwegian police on Saturday charged a man they identify as a right-wing fundamentalist Christian."
"...a gun loving Norwegian obsessed with what he saw as the threat of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration."
"Facebook page and Twitter account set up under that name [Anders Behring Breivik] days before the rampage, suggesting a conscious effort to create a public persona."
"...a remarkably meticulous attack on Norway's current and future political elite."
"...at least 85 people, some as young as 16, were killed in an attack on a summer camp..."
"...'slaughter of young children.'"
"...many from political families..."
"...the gunman calmly and methodically shot..."
"...attacker wore a police uniform..."
"...camp has been an important rite of passage for the country's budding young liberals."
"...saw a second man, about 5-foot-11, with dark hair, holding a pistol and carrying a rifle..."
"police official, Roger Andresen..."he is right-wing and a Christian fundamentalist."
"...soldiers cordoned off the square where the bombing occcured...armed soldiers in camoflauge gear was a jarring sight."
"This is the Norwegian equivalent to Timothy McVeigh."
“’This is right-wing domestic terrorism, and the big question is to what extent Norwegian agencies have diverted their attention from what they knew decades ago was the biggest threat’ and instead focused on threats from militant Islamist groups.”
"...writings on a right-wing site, Document.no, revealed...an abiding obsesion with Marxists, Mulsims, and Norway's multicultural ideals."
“'It may make a lot of people reflect on the challenges of integration and ensuring tolerance and antiracism, so that these views can be openly rejected by everyone in Norway,' Mr. Ulrichsen [reasercher at London School of Economics] said."
BBC
"...possible another person was involved."
"suspect reported by local media to have had links to right wing extremists"
"...Norway has had problems with neo-Nazi groups in the past..."
"farm supply firm has confirmed selling six tonnes of fertilizer to Breivik."
"...tall blonde man dressed as a policeman opened fire indiscriminately..."
"...two weapons, one of them an automatic rifle."
This is what has not been reported (at least when it comes to mainstream media):
"Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terror Blast"
DHS video framing white right-wing extremists ranked 6th biggest story in the world according to Alexa.com day before Oslo attacks.
Mr. Brievik may have been a practicing Free Mason? At least according to his days old Facebook page he was.
There is a massive body of evidence that government, through covert intelligence agencies, quasi-government bodies, and interested societies, have attempted to manipulate public opinion through terrorist attacks. This has been well documented for decades. The fact that mainstream media won't add this into their coverage should concern all of us.
I'm sure those of you who are unaware or outright disagree with me on these facts are thinking "conspiracy theorist", but the "lone gunman" scenario currently being proffered is not copacetic with the last 50 years of geopolitical history. Moreover, the temporal and physical proximity of this event to the current tumult being felt in Europe and throughout the world should invoke high suspicion from the fourth estate yet it has received little if no attention. Europe and the United States are being turned upside down economically and this event is being treated as if it occurred in a vacuum.
I am not submitting this event is an example of a false-flag, however, to immediately treat it prima facie as what it seems without allowing historical precedents to supply us with prudent questions and alternative scenarios is negligent. Evidence is scant so far to support anything, however, there is a glaring dearth of focus on the political ramifications of this attack. This is my point. We live in an age of hyper-politics where one act changes everything, we have a right to be suspicious.
A great book on the history of false-flag and state-sponsored terror (and their drug connections) plus a whole lot of blowback:
PurpleSerf.com
 |
| Immediately the pictures of the Oslo, Norway bombing bring back memories of the Oklahoma City bombing. Image Source: Mirror.co.uk |
It is important in any investigation to ascertain the facts before a narrative is woven. This is a taste of what is being reported in the mainstream media:
New York Times
"Norwegian police on Saturday charged a man they identify as a right-wing fundamentalist Christian."
"...a gun loving Norwegian obsessed with what he saw as the threat of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration."
"Facebook page and Twitter account set up under that name [Anders Behring Breivik] days before the rampage, suggesting a conscious effort to create a public persona."
"...a remarkably meticulous attack on Norway's current and future political elite."
"...at least 85 people, some as young as 16, were killed in an attack on a summer camp..."
"...'slaughter of young children.'"
"...many from political families..."
"...the gunman calmly and methodically shot..."
"...attacker wore a police uniform..."
"...camp has been an important rite of passage for the country's budding young liberals."
"...saw a second man, about 5-foot-11, with dark hair, holding a pistol and carrying a rifle..."
"police official, Roger Andresen..."he is right-wing and a Christian fundamentalist."
"...soldiers cordoned off the square where the bombing occcured...armed soldiers in camoflauge gear was a jarring sight."
“…questions about whether the Norwegian security services and police, which had been concentrating on threats of Islamic terrorism, missed the threat from the anti-Islamic right.”
"...writings on a right-wing site, Document.no, revealed...an abiding obsesion with Marxists, Mulsims, and Norway's multicultural ideals."
“'It may make a lot of people reflect on the challenges of integration and ensuring tolerance and antiracism, so that these views can be openly rejected by everyone in Norway,' Mr. Ulrichsen [reasercher at London School of Economics] said."
BBC
"...possible another person was involved."
"suspect reported by local media to have had links to right wing extremists"
"...Norway has had problems with neo-Nazi groups in the past..."
"farm supply firm has confirmed selling six tonnes of fertilizer to Breivik."
"...tall blonde man dressed as a policeman opened fire indiscriminately..."
"...two weapons, one of them an automatic rifle."
This is what has not been reported (at least when it comes to mainstream media):
"Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terror Blast"
DHS video framing white right-wing extremists ranked 6th biggest story in the world according to Alexa.com day before Oslo attacks.
Mr. Brievik may have been a practicing Free Mason? At least according to his days old Facebook page he was.
There is a massive body of evidence that government, through covert intelligence agencies, quasi-government bodies, and interested societies, have attempted to manipulate public opinion through terrorist attacks. This has been well documented for decades. The fact that mainstream media won't add this into their coverage should concern all of us.
I'm sure those of you who are unaware or outright disagree with me on these facts are thinking "conspiracy theorist", but the "lone gunman" scenario currently being proffered is not copacetic with the last 50 years of geopolitical history. Moreover, the temporal and physical proximity of this event to the current tumult being felt in Europe and throughout the world should invoke high suspicion from the fourth estate yet it has received little if no attention. Europe and the United States are being turned upside down economically and this event is being treated as if it occurred in a vacuum.
I am not submitting this event is an example of a false-flag, however, to immediately treat it prima facie as what it seems without allowing historical precedents to supply us with prudent questions and alternative scenarios is negligent. Evidence is scant so far to support anything, however, there is a glaring dearth of focus on the political ramifications of this attack. This is my point. We live in an age of hyper-politics where one act changes everything, we have a right to be suspicious.
A great book on the history of false-flag and state-sponsored terror (and their drug connections) plus a whole lot of blowback:
 |
| Peter Dale Scott outlines a fascinating history of covert operations and exposes the deep powers and financial interests involved. There are two states in this world, the one we know about and learn in civics class and the deep state few of us care to admit is there. |
No comments:
Post a Comment